William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
THERE HE GOES AGAIN – AT 9:27 P.M. ET: Bill Clinton, who by now should know better, is off on another campaign to brand the tea partiers as dangerous people. Shame, shame, shame:
This is really vile. First, the tea partiers aren't anti-government. They're anti wasteful government, dishonest government, and incompetent government. Second, the "slippery slope" argument doesn't wash, and never has. Third, how about some equal rhetoric directed at those who called President Bush a Nazi...or, who called Bill Clinton a racist during the Democratic primaries of 2008?
Almost any language can be taken the wrong way. And the violent individual doesn't need incendiary language. What incendiary language motivated Lee Harvey Oswald?
Wrong. It wasn't an anti-government conspiracy. It was directed specifically against the United States Government as these twisted souls saw it.
What strikes me about this Democratic crowd is how patronizing its members are. And, of course, the most patronizing are the ones who went to the "right" schools. At one time, it was Republicans who acted that way. What a role reversal.
Yes, and it applies to all sides, Bill. And maybe you ought to direct your attention to the jihadists and their sympathizers, who really do plan violence, and carry it out. We didn't hear much from you, Mr. President, after Fort Hood. April 16, 2010 |
|